TL;DR
Get hardware and tech essentials delivered free with Prime
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
- Member-only deals all year
Bitcoin was trading about 5.2% above its 200-day moving average on Nov. 3, 2026, breaking a pattern seen on the midterm election days in 2014, 2018 and 2022, when it was below that measure. CoinDesk reported that the historical setup may be supportive over a 12-month horizon, but near-term volatility and the election outcome, ETF flows and economic data could affect prices.
Bitcoin was trading about 5.2% above its 200-day average on U.S. midterm election day, Nov. 3, breaking the pattern from 2014, 2018 and 2022, when it was below the long-term trend measure. CoinDesk reported the price near $76,990 at the time of its morning update, against a 200-day average of roughly $73,169; the difference marks a change in market positioning, not a guarantee of what comes next.
CoinDesk’s Nov. 3 report said bitcoin had entered each of the previous three midterm election days below its 200-day moving average. It put the gaps at about 35% in 2014, 9% in 2018 and 22% in 2022. On election day this year, the report placed BTC roughly 5.2% above the average. The source also listed a contemporaneous price of $77,209.58, while its calculation described bitcoin as trading near $76,990; the figures reflect a live market snapshot and are not identical.
The 200-day average is a widely watched measure of longer-term price direction. CoinDesk described trading above it as a signal associated with a long-term bullish trend. That is a market convention, not proof that prices will rise. The report said bitcoin had peaked above $126,000 in October 2025 and that the subsequent downturn was relatively shallow and front-loaded, with much of the decline occurring in January and February 2026. It did not provide a full price series or a formal definition of “shallow.”
The report also noted a historical pattern of bitcoin rising in the year after midterm elections, while warning that the first few months have tended to be choppy or slightly bearish. DWF Labs research lead Martin Lee said the firm was taking a cautious view: history favored BTC over 12 months, but near-term volatility was possible. CoinDesk identified the election result, fund flows into and out of bitcoin exchange-traded funds, U.S. economic data and Federal Reserve rate expectations as factors that could influence the market.
A Different Trend Signal on Election Day
The comparison matters because it shows that bitcoin’s position going into this midterm election differs from the three prior midterm snapshots cited by CoinDesk. In those years, BTC was below its 200-day average and the report characterized each as a bear-market period. This time, the price was above that benchmark, so traders tracking the indicator see a different market setup.
That distinction is relevant to readers because election-related uncertainty arrives alongside other potential price drivers. The report pointed to ETF flows, Friday’s U.S. jobs report, interest-rate expectations and geopolitical risk as possible influences. A positive long-term indicator cannot isolate the effect of the election or predict how these factors will combine. Bitcoin remains volatile, and investors can lose some or all of the money they put into it.
The historical record may inform market expectations, but it covers only three previous midterm elections in the comparison. Lee’s comments, as reported by CoinDesk, set out the balance: a potentially stronger 12-month pattern alongside a less settled near-term period. The signal is therefore a change in the technical comparison, not confirmation of a sustained rally.
Products Worth Considering
Ledger Flex + Folio Crypto Hardware Wallet
Trezor Safe 5 Crypto Hardware Wallet with Color Touchscreen, Black Graphite
Ledger Flex Crypto Wallet
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Three Earlier Midterm Comparisons
CoinDesk compared bitcoin’s price with its 200-day average on midterm election days in 2014, 2018 and 2022. BTC was below the measure in all three cases. The 2026 reading differs because it was above the average on the morning of the election. The comparison concerns price relative to one technical indicator on particular dates; it does not establish that midterm elections caused the earlier market declines or explain the current price movement.
The report connected the earlier downturns to bitcoin’s four-year halving cycle, which it described as a pattern in which the asset has tended to peak roughly 18 months after a halving and then enter a bear-market period. It said 2026 had been expected to follow that pattern after the October 2025 peak, but the downturn had been concentrated earlier in the year. That is CoinDesk’s account of the price cycle, not a rule that determines future performance.
The report also cited historical gains in the year after midterm elections, but gave no detailed returns, sample methodology or baseline for that statement in the supplied article. Its historical observation should be read as limited context rather than a forecast. The available figures do not show whether the 2026 market will track the same post-election path.
““The first few months after a midterm have historically been choppy to slightly bearish for BTC, but it has been higher 12 months later every time. Cautious optimism is the approach we’re taking.””
— Martin Lee, research lead at DWF Labs, in an email quoted by CoinDesk
Election Outcome and Market Risks
The source reports a price snapshot from the morning of Nov. 3, not a closing price or a full-day assessment. Bitcoin prices move continuously, so the stated price and its distance from the 200-day average can change. The supplied material does not establish how BTC traded later on election day or how markets responded to the result.
It is also unclear which party or policy outcome, if any, would prompt a lasting shift in crypto markets. CoinDesk said the election result could affect the near-term trend but did not specify the direction or size of any effect. The report likewise offered no quantified analysis of ETF flows, the jobs report, Federal Reserve expectations or geopolitical developments. Those factors may move risk assets in different directions.
The historical comparison has a small sample of three earlier midterm elections and does not show that the 200-day average or election timing caused subsequent returns. The report’s statement that BTC was higher 12 months after each prior midterm was not accompanied by return figures or details on how the comparison was calculated. It remains uncertain whether that pattern will recur.
Election Results and Friday’s Jobs Data
Markets will assess the midterm result alongside other developments during the week. CoinDesk identified ETF flows and macroeconomic data as near-term considerations and pointed to the U.S. nonfarm payrolls report due Friday, Nov. 6, as a potential influence on expectations for Federal Reserve interest rates. The report did not provide a forecast for the employment figures or for bitcoin’s response.
Traders will also watch whether BTC remains above its 200-day average as prices update after the election. That level is a reference point, not a fixed support floor. Subsequent reporting and price data will clarify whether the morning reading persists and whether the election result or other events coincide with a change in direction.
Key Questions
What pattern is bitcoin breaking?
CoinDesk says bitcoin was below its 200-day average on the 2014, 2018 and 2022 U.S. midterm election days. On the morning of Nov. 3, 2026, it was about 5.2% above that average.
What does the 200-day average indicate?
It is a widely followed measure of longer-term price direction. Trading above it is often described as a bullish trend signal, but it does not guarantee that prices will rise.
Does the historical pattern mean bitcoin will rise after the election?
No. CoinDesk reported that BTC was higher 12 months after the three prior midterms it cited, while describing early post-election trading as choppy to slightly bearish. Three past cases do not establish what will happen in 2026.
What could affect bitcoin next?
The report named the election outcome, bitcoin ETF flows, Friday’s U.S. jobs report, Federal Reserve rate expectations and geopolitical risk as possible influences. Their effects on BTC remain uncertain.
Source: coindesk.com
